Submittals Management

Move Submittals through review with the full record in place.

Route packages to internal and external reviewers, capture comments, align Recommend Codes with final status, and keep every auto-generated re-submittal cycle tied to the same project record.

Submittal review queue with internal/external review groups, comment-driven status decisions, and re-submittal cycle markers.
Submittal review queue view

What ConstructFlow controls and preserves on Submittals.

  • Routed reviews
  • Comment-driven status
  • Recommend Codes
  • Final PDFs
  • Status integrity
  • Auto-generated re-submittals

Submittal review workflow

Keep the review record organized from the first package to closeout.

Keep the package, reviewers, status decisions, and next cycle visible from first submission through closeout.

Step 1

Submit package

Upload the Submittal package with attachments and project context.

Step 2

Route to reviewers

Send the package through the internal group, external reviewer, or both.

Step 3

Recommend Codes

Capture reviewer comments with recommendation codes that support the final package status.

Step 4

Auto-generate re-submittal

When revisions are needed, preserve the returned cycle and start the next submission with prior context intact.

Routing internal and external review

Route reviews through the right people before the status is final.

Separate internal review, external review, and final status decisions so the record shows who had the package and what changed.

Submittal routed through internal review group then external reviewer, with comment thread and final status.
Review routing view.

Internal review group

Coordinate project team comments before the package moves forward.

External reviewer

Send the package to outside reviewers while preserving the same review thread.

Final status

Record the final decision with the comments and attachments that informed it.

See how this fits the shared review flow foundation used across Submittals and RFIs.

Recommend Codes and status integrity

Keep comments, Recommend Codes, and final status aligned.

Submittal decisions stay easier to defend when reviewer comments, recommendation codes, approvals, files, and final package status remain attached to the same cycle.

  • Comment thread

    The full discussion stays with the package so reviewer direction remains visible beside the final status.

  • Reviewer mentions

    Bring the right reviewer back to the exact package context that needs attention.

  • Recommend Codes

    Recommendation codes make reviewer direction easier to compare against the final package status.

  • Return for changes

    When a package is returned, comment direction and status context move with it into the next generated cycle.

How status decisions stay aligned

  • Reviewer comments identify required changes or approval conditions.
  • Recommend Codes summarize reviewer direction without replacing the final package status.
  • Project managers keep the final status tied to the comments and attachments that informed it.
  • Returned cycles preserve prior direction before the next Submittal is generated.

For cross-module comments, mentions, and handoffs, see shared comments and collaboration controls.

Alerts and reminders

Reminders that support the review cycle.

Use status alerts, reminders, and comment notifications to keep review movement visible.

Status alerts

Notify the team when review state changes or a package is returned.

Reminder cadence

Keep due reviews visible to the people responsible for the next step.

Mention and comment alerts

Bring reviewers back to the exact package context that needs attention.

See shared alerts and reminders for the cross-module workflow view.

Document creation

Create final review documents from the same record.

Turn routing, comments, decisions, attachments, and version history into a final PDF package or coversheet for project records.

  • Final PDF package

    Compile the cycle's package and final status into one PDF that matches the decisions made.

  • Coversheet summary

    Summarize routing, status, and reviewers on a coversheet that travels with the package.

  • Comment history

    Carry the comment trail with the deliverable so the rationale stays with the record.

  • Version record

    Document versions stay tied to the cycle so prior submissions remain part of the record.

For evidence-based response drafting, see the shared project record intelligence workflow.

Automatic re-submittals

Auto-generate the next cycle without losing the prior one.

When a Submittal is returned, ConstructFlow can preserve the previous comments, Recommend Codes, status decisions, and document versions while starting the next cycle with context.

  1. Cycle 1 submitted

    Package enters review with attachments and routing.

  2. Comments returned

    Reviewers identify changes and status direction.

  3. Next cycle generated

    The revised package is tracked as the next cycle with prior context intact.

  4. Approved record

    The final decision remains tied to the cycle history.

Cycle preservation

When a Submittal returns for changes, the prior cycle's comments, Recommend Codes, status decisions, and document versions remain part of the record so the next cycle starts with the full history in view.

Exports and closeout

Export the review record for closeout.

Package the Submittal record into final PDFs, coversheets, and closeout exports with comments and decisions kept together.

Final PDFs

Final review PDFs are generated against the cycle's record so the deliverable matches the decisions made.

Coversheet packages

Coversheets summarize routing, comments, and final status, so the package is legible to anyone receiving it.

Closeout exports

Exports are built for handover at closeout. The comment trail, status decisions, and final files travel together.

For shared exports and closeout behavior across Submittals and RFIs, see shared exports and closeout support.

Submittals FAQ

Submittals Management FAQ.

Straight answers for teams evaluating how Submittals are routed, reviewed, and preserved.

What does ConstructFlow Submittals Management cover?

It covers routing Submittal packages through review groups, capturing comments, aligning Recommend Codes with final status, and preserving auto-generated re-submittal history.

Can comments and approvals stay tied to the Submittal package?

Yes. Attachments, comments, approvals, status changes, and re-submittal history can stay connected to the package record.

Can ConstructFlow create final review documents?

The workflow can support final PDF packages, coversheets, comment histories, version records, and closeout exports.

How are re-submittal cycles handled?

Returned Submittals can start a new generated cycle while prior comments, Recommend Codes, status decisions, and document versions remain part of the record.

Does AI approve Submittals automatically?

No. AI-supported language is for reviewer drafting only. A reviewer must approve decisions before the workflow moves forward.

Ready for a closer look

See how Submittals move through ConstructFlow.

Review routing, comments, final documents, and re-submittal history in one walkthrough.